750
FEDERAL REPORTER,
vol. 71.
least 70 feet to the southward of the wreck. And, third, assuming the Schlesinger struck the wreck there is nothing but inference to show that she caused the damage described. The libel is dismissed.
ALLIANCE TRUST CO. v. MASTIN et at. (Circuit Court of A.ppeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 679. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. John D. S. Cook and A. N. Gossett, for appellant. Hugh C. Ward and L. C. Krauthotr, for appellees. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel tor appellant. December 2, 1895.)
O. A. GBIO & BROS. WHOLESALE LIQUOR CO. v. HOSTETTER CO. (two cases). (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 16, 1896.) Nos. 699, 700.
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States tor the Eastern District of Missouri. Robert E·. Collins, for appellants. · George Denison and A. H. Clarke, for appellee. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellants.
-====-==CLEAVELAND v. CAMPBELL PRINTING-PRESS & MANUFACTURING CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 21, 1896.) No. 705. In Error to the CircUit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. James B. Belford and Thomas Ward, Jr., for plaintiff in error. F. A. Williams and G. W. Whitford, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation of counsel,
FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. et al. v. HOLLY MANUF'G CO. (Oircuit Court ot Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 722. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Charles Offutt, for appellee. No opini<1n. Docketed and dismissetl, pursuant to the sixteenth rule (11 C. C. A. cVl., 47 Fed. viii.), on motion ot counsel tor appellee. October 21, 1895.)
· MEM.ORANDUM DECISIONS.
751
GOURDAIN v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth CircuIt. No. 646. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. R. B. Welch, Henry Keeler, and J. W. Ady, for plaIntiff In error. W. C. Perry, U. S. Atty., for the United States. No opinion. DIsmissed, without costs to either party In thIs court, for want of jurisdiction, on motion of counsel for defendant In error. October 2, 1895.)
HUTCHINSON v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 678Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. W. H. Rosslngton and Charles Blood Smith, for appellant. James McKinstry and lj'. F. Prigg, for appellee. No opinion. Reversed, at the costs of appellant, and remanded, with direction to circuit court to remand the cause to the state court at the costs of the party removing same. October 23, 1895.)
JOSEPH SCHLITZ BREWING CO. v. LEIFHEIT. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 685. In Error to the CircuIt Court of the United States for the Northern District of Iowa. Henry Rickel, for plaintiff In error. Timothy Brown, for defendant In error. No opinion. Dismissed. with costs, for want of jurisdiction, on motion of counsel for defendant In error. October 23, 1895.)
NATIONAL WATER WORKS CO. OF NEW YORK v. KANSAS CITY, MO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 697. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District Df Missouri. 0. O. T1chenor, Gardiner Lathrop, and L. C. Krauthoff, for appellants. H. C. McDougal and Frank Hagerman, for appellee. Reversed, with costs, per stipnlation of parties, and remanded for further lIroceedings. September 2, 1895.)