131 F3d 143 Calloway v. Cox

131 F.3d 143

Billie CALLOWAY, Appellant,
v.
Eleanor L.V. COX, Jointly and severally and her insurance
carrier in her official capacity as Principal with the
Little Rock Public School System; Little Rock School
District, Jointly and severally and its insurance carrier in
its official capacity as a school">public school corporate in its
own name for the Little Rock Public School System; Allene
S. Christopher, Jointly and severally and her insurance
carrier in her former official capacity as Public Employee
Claims Manager; Jon H. Dodson, Jointly and severally and
his insurance carrier in his official capacity as Medical
Doctor for Forest Park Medical Clinic and Cambridge
Rehabilitation Center and Forest Park Medical Clinic and
Cambridge Rehabilitation Center Pro Se Collection Agency;
Gregory S. Kaczenski, Jointly and severally and his
insurance carrier in his official capacity as
Neuropsychiatrist and State Board Certified
Neuropsychiatrist with Kaczenski Private Practice; Does, I
through X, Inclusive, Appellees.

No. 97-1779EA.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 14, 1997.
Decided: Nov. 19, 1997.

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Billie Calloway appeals the district court's dismissal of Calloway's time-barred complaint asserting federal civil rights and state law claims. Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we are satisfied that the district court correctly dismissed Calloway's complaint. We also conclude the district court's denial of Calloway's motion for appointment of counsel was not an abuse of discretion. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.